MEK (methyl ethyl ketone)

PRODUCER

CAPACITY*

Celanese, Pampa

90

ExxonMobil Chemical, Baton Rouge, La.

300

Shell Chemical, Norco, La.

300

Total

690

*Millions of pounds per year of methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), or 2-butanone.

ExxonMobile and Shell produce methyl ethyl ketone by the catalytic dehydrogenation of sec-butanol. The alcohol is obtained in a two-step process starting from butenes. Both companies have made modest improvements in the past two years to their respective MEK units, increasing annual capacity to 300 million pounds per year at each site.

Celanese derives methyl ethyl ketone as a byproduct in acetic acid production by the liquid-phase oxidation of n-butane.

Profile last published 3/1/99; this revision, 10/27/03.

DEMAND

2001: 422 million pounds; 2002: 421 million pounds; 2006: 445 million pounds, projected. Demand equals production plus imports (2001: 33 million pounds; 2002: 26 million pounds) less exports (2001: 194 million pounds; 2002: 263 million pounds).

GROWTH

Historical (1997 - 2002): 1.8 percent per year; future: 1.5 percent per year through 2006.

PRICE

Historical (1997 - 2002): High, 51.0¢ per pound, tanks, Gulf, contract, dlvd. East; low, 36.0, same basis. Current: 37.0, same basis.

USES

Coatings solvent, 55 percent; adhesives, 14 percent; chemical intermediates, 7 percent; lube oil de-waxing, 6 percent; magnetic tapes, 5 percent; printing inks, 4 percent; miscellaneous, 9 percent.

STRENGTH

In 1996 the Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to unlist MEK from the Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) roster. In 1999 the CMA filed a complete petition to unlist MEK using new information to show the chemical’s lack of toxicity. Last May, the EPA published a Federal Register notice that proposes removing MEK from the list of HAPs under section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act. The notice in the Federal Register initiates a comment period (through August 28, 2003) in which comments can be made to the EPA on the proposed ruling. Following a review of the comments received, the EPA will decide whether or not to unlist MEK from the HAPs list.

Removal of MEK from the HAPs list could reverse the declining trend of MEK’s use as a solvent in coating applications, MEK’s largest application segment. Coating solvent applications employ MEK as an active solvent to dissolve resins, pigments and other constituents. MEK is favored for applications in coatings that utilize highly polar resins such as epoxies, urethanes, cellulosics and vinyls. Much of the use of MEK is in wood furniture finishing and automotive refinishing, where low-solids coatings still predominate.

The use of MEK in adhesives, chemical intermediates and printing inks represents strongest segments of growth – all growing at rates between 2 and 3 percent annually. Together, these segments make up 25 percent of MEK’s demand.

WEAKNESS

MEK has been in decline as a solvent for coating applications since the late 1980s when the EPA proposed to limit volatile organic compounds and classify MEK as a hazardous air pollutant. Unless this trend is turned around, by a reversal EPA ruling as noted above, MEK in solvent coating applications will continue to diminish. MEK consumed in coating applications was 340 million pounds in 1988, but had declined to 230 million pounds in 2002.

MEK is used in solvent blends for urethane lacquers that are used to coat magnetic tapes for computers, instrumentation and video and audio equipment. Consumption in this application has decreased over the last few years, especially with the rise in usage of compact discs (CDs) and digital versatile disks (DVDs). With increased competition from waterbornes, other solvent systems, better solvent recovery and the increasing shift to CDs and DVDs, consumption of MEK in this application is expected to decline over the forecast period by 2 percent annually. Consumption of MEK in this application segment was 22 million pounds in 2002.

MEK functions as a de-waxing agent during the refining of lubricating oils. More efficient engines today produce fewer emissions, decreasing MEK demand in de-waxing operations. During the forecast period, this sector is anticipated to be flat.

OUTLOOK

Short term growth for MEK is projected to be very modest. MEK is a mature product, but with the recovering economy all sectors excepting lube oil de-waxing and magnetic tapes should produce an aggregate growth rate of 1.5 percent for the forecast period. Longer term, if the EPA does follow through and remove MEK from the HAPs list, the coatings solvents sector should respond with positive growth. If this happens, then aggregate growth could amount to as much as 2.5 percent annually.

HISTORICAL DATA

Year

Demand

Millions of Pounds

Average Annual Price*

¢ per pound, tanks, Gulf, contract, dlvd. East

1997

386

42.1

1998

431

39.0

1999

436

37.5

2000

431

46.0

2001

422

48.1

2002

421

43.9

Back to Chemical Profiles List